Judge Rejects Petitions to Suspend Ban on Sale of Vaping Products

Much to the chagrin of vape stores, a federal judge in Boston did not authorize a temporary restraining order, allowing them to instantaneously resume sale of vaping products. As a result, the state-wide ban on vaping products to regional buyers stays on.

On September 24th, Gov. Charlie Baker declared a public health emergency citing numerous illnesses and deaths across the nation due to vaping. Baker asked for a temporary ban on the sale of vaping products, also restricting the display of the products for public viewing. With the emergency declaration implemented, the Department of Public Health lanced a four-month ban, giving researchers ample time to evaluate the reason behind an upsurge in illnesses caused due to vaping.

Vapor Technology Association and attorneys for several local vape shop owners argued against the ban, deeming it as an existential threat to their business and noting that a two-week wait for a preliminary injunction hearing will cause them irreparable harm.

Running counter to their argument, Judge Indira Talwani set an October 15th hearing to reassess the industry’s petition for a preliminary injunction to end the ban.

Attorney Craig Rourke said while he will be able to argue completely on the merits of the case later this month, the ban will put his clients out of the business.

“Many of my clients are like most of us: We struggle hard from week to week to pay for gas or to buy groceries, to make the rent or to pay the mortgage. Two weeks without income can be a very difficult hardship,” he said.

The Attorneys representing the state argued that the ban should stay in place because of the high health risk possible related to vaping.

Assistant Attorney General Julia Kobick informed Judge Talwani that the Legislature gave the governor the authority to declare a public health emergency. Moreover, Kobick told Judge Talwani that the ban was set up in an attempt to avoid more illnesses.

DPH informed WBUR there have been eleven suspected cases of vaping-related illnesses in the state as of Wednesday. According to the agency, five of the aforesaid cases have been confirmed and reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

What do you think about the judge’s decision to not lift the ban? Let us know in the comments section below.

Source.

Sana Khan
Hey! I am a product of the '90s. While selling things without speaking a single word is my forte, I love to develop websites and content.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Sponsor

Latest

Side Effects of Vaping and Why is CDC Still Urging People to Stop Vaping

In a new report released on Mon day, CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) health officials affirmed that the vaping-linked lung illnesses that...

SWAG II Kit by Vaporesso

Today we are going to review SWAG II Kit by Vaporesso and before we start digging into the actual device to see you know...

The Honeymoon Period for Juul’s Marijuana Sibling, Pax Labs Might be Ending Soon

Juul Labs and Pax Labs split into two different companies back in 2017, hoping to reach new heights. While Juul emerged as a dominant...

Podstick Vape Kit by Vaporesso for £17.99 GBP at NEW VAPING

The New Vaping drops the price of Podstick Vape Kit to £17.99 whereas the original price of the kit is £29.99 which means you...

MOTI Vaping Brand: Alternative to Bad Smelling Cigarettes

Added Age Restriction Screen to the Official Website MOTI is a popular vaping liquids brand that recently updated their website's...